Ford Explorers Are Generally Reliable but Have Model-Year Variations

Ford Explorers earn average-to-above-average reliability ratings, but performance varies by generation. Newer models (2020+) show improved dependability, while older years (2011-2019) face common issues like transmission problems, water leaks, and electrical glitches. Proper maintenance and timely recalls significantly boost longevity.

Key Reliability Factors

  • Engine & Transmission: 3.5L V6 (naturally aspirated) is robust; 2.3L EcoBoost and 10-speed transmissions (2020+) have fewer complaints.
  • Electrical Systems: Infotainment glitches and sensor failures are frequent in 2016-2019 models.
  • Build Quality: Rust in older frames (pre-2020) and water leaks in liftgates affect long-term durability.
  • Safety Recalls: Critical recalls (e.g., rear toe link fractures, brake issues) were addressed in later years.

Reliability by Generation

Generation Years Reliability Rating (5 = Best) Common Issues Avg. Repair Cost/Year
5th Gen (Current) 2020-Present 4.2 Minor infotainment bugs, rare transmission hiccups $500-$700
4th Gen 2011-2019 3.5 Water leaks, transmission failure (2016-2017), electrical gremlins $800-$1,200
3rd Gen 2006-2010 3.0 Timing chain wear, suspension rust, fuel pump failures $1,000-$1,500

How to Improve Explorer Reliability

  1. Follow the maintenance schedule: Prioritize transmission fluid changes (every 60K miles) and timing chain inspections (pre-2020 models).
  2. Check for recalls: Use the NHTSA website to verify open recalls by VIN-especially for 2011-2019 models.
  3. Inspect for water leaks: Examine the liftgate, sunroof drains, and floorboards annually to prevent electrical corrosion.
  4. Avoid severe towing: EcoBoost engines (2020+) can tow but overloading accelerates wear.
  5. Use OEM parts: Aftermarket sensors/transmission components often trigger error codes.

Pros and Cons of Owning an Explorer

Pros

  • Spacious 3-row seating with adult-friendly legroom (post-2020).
  • Strong resale value for well-maintained newer models.
  • Available AWD with terrain management (ideal for light off-roading).
  • Hybrid option (2020+) improves fuel efficiency (27 MPG combined).

Cons

  • Higher-than-average repair costs for electrical/transmission issues.
  • Poor fuel economy in older V6 models (16-18 MPG city).
  • Ride quality can feel stiff with larger wheels (20+ inch rims).
  • Early 4th-gen models (2011-2015) have chronic water leak risks.

Alternatives with Better Reliability Ratings

  • Toyota Highlander: Fewer transmission issues, lower maintenance costs (avg. $450/year).
  • Honda Pilot: More consistent electrical systems, better fuel economy (22 MPG combined).
  • Mazda CX-9: Lighter weight improves handling; Skyactiv engine is highly durable.